The putative descent of birds from dinosaurs has become established as one of the most popular evolutionary transitions.

Creationists have often used the 2nd law of thermodynamics to criticize naturalistic origins, but they have not always properly treated the subject.

This is the first of a three-part series. This first paper discusses Habermehl's 2011 paper, “Where in the World is the Tower of Babel?”

In this second of a three-part series, Habermehl further discusses the placement of the Exodus in Egyptian history and methodology.

In this third of a three-part series, there is further discussion of Habermehl's 2024 paper on Jericho.

The Bright Angel Formation beds easily responded to soft-sediment deformation to form the smooth bending in the Whitmore Helipad fold.

While we will answer the objections to our 2022 and 2023 papers here in a cursory manner, most of them will be thoroughly handled in the appropriate papers in the series.

The study presented here uses a reconstruction of a Y chromosome tree based on the biblical assumption that all humans have descended from Noah.

This paper maintains that we all want a good correlation of the archaeological record with the Bible, but Griffth and White's ARJ papers of 2022–3 are not the way to achieve it.

This paper asserts that it is not possible to run the Egyptian Old and Middle Kingdoms in parallel and that the date of the Trojan War is not necessarily that provided by ancient Greek historians.

This paper proposes biblically based scientific philosophies as well as providing suggested mechanisms for the development of a bible-based scientific model for the four major scientific communities.

Showing that Joshua's wall was the one destroyed at the end of the Early Bronze IIIB period and Hiel's wall dates to the Middle Bronze I.

The Babylonian dynasties of Berossus are incomplete. The authors solve for the missing values. The resulting table of Berossus covers the era from the Flood to the conquest of Babylon by Cyrus.

Matthew McLain, Dr. Marcus Ross, Matt Petrone, Noël Lay, and Matthew Speights take issue with Dr. Gabriela Haynes' 2022 discussion of the difference between birds and dinosaurs.

This paper aims to address some issues raised by McLain et al. (2023) in an article titled “Response to ‘The Debate over Classification of Archaeopteryx as a Bird.'”

In this paper we will show that the biblical and Egyptian chronologies produce timelines that diverge greatly back before about 600 B.C.

Hitler was following the teachings of his mentor, Karl Ernst Haushofer, and Haushofer's disciples, including Rudolf Hess and a few other academics and scholars.

This paper compares the two chronological approaches and highlights a wide array of historical texts and archaeological finds relevant to dating events in the Old Testament.

As a result of archaeological research, the landing of the sons of Noah and their early movements are able to be followed. It will be argued that biblical history makes sense of the findings.

The Cambodian genocide that resulted in the loss of an estimated two million lives was reviewed.

Evolutionists assert that several dinosaur species had feathers, but what do the genes say?

The author responds by providing background context and motivations for the original paper. His assumptions are revisited with further corroboration.

This is a critique of the application of ideational cognitive archaeology to determining the location of Noah's Ark.

This is the fourth paper in a series with the goal to build a model of ancient history consistent with the biblical text using durations by ancient chroniclers.

This paper evaluates the evidence for the evolution of animal food intake systems.