Attempts to harmonize living fossil research with mutation research fail.

Attempts to harmonize living fossil research with mutation research fail.

A recent news item caught my eye, as it stated that “a biological mechanism can explain [gar's] status as ‘living fossils.'”

A recent news item caught my eye, as it stated that “a biological mechanism can explain [gar's] status as ‘living fossils.'”

The living fossil myth: are they really 66 million years old?

The living fossil myth: are they really 66 million years old?

These stories from March 2003 are useful for comparing what science was saying 21 years ago with discoveries since then.

These stories from March 2003 are useful for comparing what science was saying 21 years ago with discoveries since then.

The original color molecules from snails are still present after 12 million Darwin Years.

Where's the evolution? In these creatures, fossils show complex parts already working.

They appear earlier than thought, but show no sign of evolutionary transition.

Evolutionists never question the vast ages for fossils that are exquisitely preserved.

Explaining a fossil's history is not an observation; it is an inference from assumptions.

Fossils do not interpret themselves. It takes fallible humans.

If there really was a global flood as described in Genesis, what would we expect to see today? Where are all the fossils of pre-flood humans?