Russellville Arkansas (AR)
Bentonville Arkansas (AR)
Springdale Arkansas (AR)
Lincoln Arkansas (AR)
Van Buren Arkansas (AR)
Arkansas Attorney General Leslie Rutledge is in court today requesting that a three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis vacateĀ U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker's injunction and allow three laws passed in 2019 to be enforced. The trio of laws are familiar to readers of NRL News Today and are [ā¦]
Mike Huckabee, the former Arkansas governor, called out the double standard imposed by the mainstream media after some Kansas City... View ArticleThe post Mike Huckabee: Iām Done With the NFL and the NBA appeared first on Todd Starnes.
Major archaeological discoveries will have to wait until next year, at least.Dale Manor had a plan for 2020: Unearth an ancient Canaanite shrine in the lowlands of Judah, about 20 miles west of Jerusalem. Like so many plans for 2020, it was interrupted by a global pandemic.So now the professor emeritus of archaeology and Bible at Harding University in Arkansas has a plan for 2021: Unearth that Canaanite shrine in Beth Shemesh, the city where the Philistines returned the captured Ark of the Covenant to Israel in 1 Samuel 6.There are some drawbacks to putting an excavation on hold, Manor told Christianity Today. āThere is an increased risk of site deterioration, both from the elements and plundering,ā he said.A highway also runs through the ancient Beth Shemesh site, and it is in the process of being widened. There have been some conflicts in Israel between the people who want the road and the people trying to preserve the biblical history buried underneath it.The pause couldnāt be avoided, however. For biblical archaeologists, 2020 will be remembered as the summer without digs. Most projects were stopped as the coronavirus spread and international travel was suspended.There were a few exceptions. An Israeli team did about a month of work at Tel Azekah, the site of the confrontation between David and Goliath (1 Sam. 17:1) and a Babylonian siege (Jer. 34:7).Manor and other archaeologists said they used this summer to catch up on their analysis of artifacts and writing, while remaining hopeful that excavation work can resume again next year. Archaeology didnāt stop, they said, even if excavation did.For now, biblical cities and sites wait across the Holy Land, their treasures yet to be revealed.On the northern shore of the Sea of Galilee, excavation ...Continue reading...
The average American would likely say that our country is a democracy, ruled by the people. Historians would explain that it is a constitutional democratic republic, ruled by the representatives of the people, whose power is defined and constrained by the Constitution. Many cynical observers, particularly in and around Washington, D.C., might argue that it is really a bureaucracy, ruled by the endlessly expanding regulatory agencies.In reality, however, in many cases nine unelected individuals who hold their positions for life can effortlessly overturn, with a simple majority vote, the will of the people, their representatives, and the executive agenciesāthwarting our constitutional structure itself. A government where that is true can only be described as an oligarchy.All governing bodies tend to work towards the expansion of their own power. It is no surprise that presidents try to overstep their authority, that regulatory agencies continually expand, or that the federal government tries to encroach on the powers of the states.The U.S. Supreme Court, however, has assumed a level of authority that significantly alters the contours of our constitutional structure and threatens the very notion of our republic. The Oxford English Dictionary defines ārepublicā as āa state in which power rests with the people or their representatives.ā Accordingly, Article I, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution explicitly places āall legislative power granted hereinā into the hands of Congress. The representatives of the people were intended to wield the power over the content of the law, limited only by the Constitution itself. This is far from being the case today.The Supreme Court has demonstrated that it is willing and able to successfully oppose both Congress and the direct will of the people. Consider the example of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which was perhaps Congressā strongest effort to regain its power from the clutches of the judiciary. The act was unanimously passed by Congress and signed by President Clinton in response to the 1990 case of Employment Division v. Smith, in which the justices limited religious freedom in a manner that alarmed much of the American public. The law was meant to provide a more expansive definition of religious freedom.However, the will of our elected representatives in the House and Senate, in tandem with that of the president, proved no match for six justices, who struck down aspects of RFRA in the 1997 case of City of Boerne v. Flores on the grounds that it contradicted their earlier opinion and exceeded Congressās enforcement authority under the Constitution. Justice Kennedy, in the majority opinion, brazenly asserted judicial supremacy, saying that ā[w]hen the political branches of the Government act against the background of a judicial interpretation of the Constitution already issued, it must be understood that in later cases and controversies the Court will treat its precedents with the respect due them under settled principles ā¦ and contrary expectations must be disappointed. It is this Courtās precedent, not RFRA, which must control.ā In other words, the justices ruled that decisions of the Court supersede those of Congress.The Supreme Court hasnāt hesitated to overturn the direct will of the American people on other issues either. The overwhelming majority of Americans support the idea of term limits for Congressmen. However, when 23 states passed term limit legislationā15 of them by referendumāfive justices overturned the will of those millions of voters. In the 1995 case of U.S. Term Limits, Inc. v. Thornton, the Court ruled that states cannot add requirements to their Congressmen beyond those prescribed by the Constitution. In his heated and potent dissent, Justice Thomas said:It is ironic that the ā¦ majority ā¦ defends the right of the people of Arkansas to āchoose whom they please to govern themā by invalidating a provision that won nearly 60% of the votes cast in a direct election and that carried every congressional district in the State. ... Nothing in the Constitution deprives the people of each State of the power to prescribe eligibility requirements for ā¦ candidates ... And where the Constitution is silent, it raises no bar to action by the States or the people.Nevertheless, five justices disliked the idea of term limits and ignored the direct will and votes of the citizens who opposed them. This is not democratic at all.Examples of similar cases abound. Just this year, in the case of Bostock v. Clayton County, the Supreme Court decided to dramatically alter the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by expanding the obvious meaning of āsexā to include āsexual orientationā and āgender identity.ā In this case, the Court was obstructing the will of the people by tampering with a legislative and not a constitutional provision, and if Congress wishes, it can pass a law responding to Bostock. Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri accurately described the majority opinion as an āhistoric piece of legislation.āIt is clear that in many cases, the justices of the Supreme Court have openly transformed themselves into legislators. On certain issues, the judiciary has wielded absolute and unquestioned power over the content and meaning of the law. Whether this is to be celebrated or mourned is a question for another time. However, we can no longer deny it is occurring. We may not have fully lost the notion of our republic as of yet, but we are on the treacherous road toward doing so.Ben Householder is an Honors student at Regent University.
A single monther in Kansas City, Missouri is making headlines after she donated her $100 lottery winnings to a injured police officer, despite needing the funds herself.
Powered by Ekklesia-Online