Tiktaalik is a fish fossil that supposedly had the beginnings of “legs.” Is this creature the missing link?

Tiktaalik is a fish fossil that supposedly had the beginnings of “legs.” Is this creature the missing link?

Tiktaalik is a fish fossil that supposedly had the beginnings of “legs.” Is this creature the missing link?

Tiktaalik is a fish fossil that supposedly had the beginnings of “legs.” Is this creature the missing link?

Tiktaalik is a fish fossil that supposedly had the beginnings of “legs.” Is this creature the missing link?

Tiktaalik is a fish fossil that supposedly had the beginnings of “legs.” Is this creature the missing link?

The putative descent of birds from dinosaurs has become established as one of the most popular evolutionary transitions.

Attempts to harmonize living fossil research with mutation research fail.

Attempts to harmonize living fossil research with mutation research fail.

A recent news item caught my eye, as it stated that “a biological mechanism can explain [gar's] status as ‘living fossils.'”

A recent news item caught my eye, as it stated that “a biological mechanism can explain [gar's] status as ‘living fossils.'”

The living fossil myth: are they really 66 million years old?

These stories from March 2003 are useful for comparing what science was saying 21 years ago with discoveries since then.

Another fake fossil used to document evolution has been exposed.

Evolutionists continue to ignore dinosaur soft tissue as they pontificate about fossilization.

The original color molecules from snails are still present after 12 million Darwin Years.

More evolutionists admit major problems exist with this fossil and its interpretation.

Where's the evolution? In these creatures, fossils show complex parts already working.

Like a rabbit's foot, evolutionary paleontologists hope Darwinism will bring them good luck.

They appear earlier than thought, but show no sign of evolutionary transition.

Evolutionists never question the vast ages for fossils that are exquisitely preserved.

Explaining a fossil's history is not an observation; it is an inference from assumptions.

A new fossil chordate puts even more bang in the Cambrian explosion.

Fossils do not interpret themselves. It takes fallible humans.

Evolutionary progress? No. Look at the fossil record to witness higher "fitness" than today.