Size is no longer considered a sign of health by the average church member or spiritual seeker.
There are very few pastors who would say that bigger churches are inherently better than smaller churches. But most pastors believe it would be better if their church got bigger.
Not only do most pastors want their churches to get bigger, they believe it’s worth an extraordinary expenditure of time, effort and money to make numerical increase happen.
Most of our congregation members don’t agree.
This disparity between pastoral desires and congregational expectations is a relatively new phenomenon. There are a lot of pastors who haven’t caught up with this reality.
Most of their church members don’t agree that getting more people in the room is necessarily better for their church. And it’s not because they’re not concerned about evangelism. Something else is going on here.
A Generational Shift Regarding Church Growth
Less than a generation ago, if a pastor promoted a building campaign, almost everyone in the church would step up. They’d get excited by it, give extra offerings for it, and see it as a positive sign of health for the church.
It was unquestioned – if your church was healthy, it would grow, and if it grew it would need bigger buildings.
It’s being questioned now.
Certainly there will always be people who love a crowd and who will follow the next big thing. And there will always be churches that appeal to them. There are also churches that attract large crowds for healthy, life-giving reasons.
But size is no longer considered the obvious sign of health that it used to be. At least not by the average church member. And certainly not by the spiritual seeker.
Bigger is no longer considered better, and things that get better are no longer expected to get bigger as a result. ...
|Tags: Karl Vaters “Get More People The Room” Dead. Here's What's Replacing|
|Rating: 0.00 (0 votes) Rate this article|
|Bookmark and share this news item:|
Powered by Ekklesia-Online